Isaac Was Abraham's Only Child; Ishmael Was Not His Biological Child, According To Apostle Suleman - Legitvibes -

: Suleman points to Genesis 22:2 , where God tells Abraham, "Take now thy son, thine only son Isaac". He argues that if Ishmael were recognized as Abraham’s son by God, this phrasing would be inaccurate.

: In mainstream theology, the distinction is usually made between legitimacy in the covenant rather than biological paternity. : Suleman points to Genesis 22:2 , where

: While Genesis 22:2 uses "only son," other scriptures like Genesis 25:9 state that "his sons Isaac and Ishmael buried him," acknowledging both as his children. : While Genesis 22:2 uses "only son," other

youtube.com/watch?v=PvD41obVdwI">Spirit of Ishmael and its impact on the church? Suleman posits that Isaac is Abraham's only son

According to a teaching by , Ishmael is not considered the biological son of " Abraham ," but rather the son of Abram . Suleman posits that Isaac is Abraham's only son because God only addressed him as "Abraham" after the covenant change, which occurred before Isaac's birth. Key Arguments from Apostle Suleman's Teaching